| Bio 466 Spring 2004 | Name_____________________________ |
The two teams have presented two perspectives as presented by authors Loeb (Pro) and Regan (Con). They have debated the proposition. Your role now is to evaluate the debate results.
Information about you!
What is your personal opinion on the issue? Pro Con
Which team in the completed debate...
gave the most-convincing arguments? Pro Con
most-successfully rebutted the other's criticisms? Pro Con
"won" this debate? Pro Con
Comments for each team:
Pro:
Con:
| Bio 466 Spring 2002 | Name_____________________________ |
The two teams have presented two perspectives as presented by authors Angell (Pro) and Foley (Con). They have debated the proposition. Your role now is to evaluate the debate results.
Information about you!
What is your personal opinion on the issue? Pro Con
Which team in the completed debate...
gave the most-convincing arguments? Pro Con
most-successfully rebutted the other's criticisms? Pro Con
"won" this debate? Pro Con
Comments for each team:
Pro:
Con:
This page © Ross E. Koning 1994.
Go to the Course Schedule Page.
Go to the Plant Physiology Information Homepage.
Send comments and bug reports to Ross Koning at rkoning@snet.net.